Back on track

Last week, my mentor and I worked on developing new research questions for my refocused project: How have historians of Nazi Germany used photography by German soldiers on the Eastern Front? What is the relationship between past realities and photography, and how do historians deal with this relationship? Are photographs documentary evidence of past realities, or manipulated ideologically by the photographer?

In order to answer these questions, I am in the process of conducting a review of historical and photographic literature to see how historians and scholars in related disciplines have used photos as evidence. Thus far, historical debates relating to the use of photos has arisen in my literature review. Some historians use photos to visually explain what is being argued in the written text, and thus consider photos as windows to past realities. Other historians argue that photos take on different meanings over time, and thus are not realistic representations of the past. Thus, these historians argue that photos should be treated as distinct pieces of evidence that need to be interpreted and explained. Hence, there is a lack of consensus on how photos, particularly of the Nazi era on the Eastern Front, should be used in history.

At the end of my literature review, I will to begin drafting an argument on my findings and judgement of the use of photography in the history of Nazi Germany.

Working with two mentors on this project is essential to research as an undergrad. They have helped shape my project, challenged me to ask complex questions,and overcome obstacles. They have really helped me define what it means to conduct historical research, and have gone above and beyond to help set foundations for a future in historical research.


3 thoughts on “Back on track

  1. That countdown to URAD you have is freaking me out. I know I have 2 months, STOP REMINDING ME. 🙂

    Any idea on what your argument will be based on what you’ve seen so far?

    • What initially interested me in this topic was the project one of my mentors is working on, about children in photography. As I came across photographs by German soldiers during the war, I began noticing some inconsistencies in how historians use these photos.

      In an age of visual culture, more and more historians are turning to photography as historical evidence, not just mere illustration. So I think it is important to develop a careful methodology to analyze photography just like we would a written source.

      Also, I think photography is a relatively underlooked facet of the debate on the role and beliefs of the Wehrmacht on the eastern front. A careful analysis of photography is essential to understanding the dynamic of Wehrmacht actions on the front, and the experiences of the subjects of these photographs. Essentially, Photographs can make a significant contribution to our understanding of the past.

      Sorry that was lengthy, I got a little carried away 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s